< e.g. I have published models 10 yrs ago and am still discovering their latent hypotheses. It's a fertile ground for new work
-
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @bradpwyble and
But I don't think it's a problem. I see specifications of models as approximate theories. But model == theory? Not for me.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @josueortc and
So what's the difference? 140 characters... Go! :)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bradpwyble @josueortc and
A theory makes predictions and explanations, models are a loose subset with overlap of that where they may make predictions that are wrong
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @bradpwyble and
in essence, ie outside the theory. For example using just a model one might assume things have to be implemented as in the model whereas the
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @bradpwyble and
theory might have a loose allowance. Can go deeper but I've written a bit about this off twitter, if you're interested?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @bradpwyble and
For example you can within the same theory produce different models.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @bradpwyble and
This is my understanding and I'm sure others have their own ideas about differences. Same as differences between theory and hypothesis.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @bradpwyble and
You can also accidentally create models which do stuff outside the theoretical framework because it was underspecfied.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
More than here if you're interested http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2013.05.001 …
-
-
-
Replying to @bradpwyble @josueortc and
You're welcome but I firmly believe we don't have to agree as I think you're way of looking at it is logical too.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.