thank you both! that is very informative and helpful, not to mention very interesting!
-
-
Also no theory attached to the brain and yet the model captures human vision computations.
-
But they don't really have "no idea". That's just a turn of phrase. They do understand basic principles of CNN, just not how it all fits >
-
<That's true of all model authors to varying degrees, just more extreme with DNN authors. E.g. my comp neuro. models still produce surprises
-
These people aren't in cogsci. But I have a feeling we use understand and theory differently.
-
Some of the best (in terms of classification accuracy) models are just "add more layers". Eventually this heuristic might not help. Why?
-
That lack of understanding doesn't make then atheoretical, IMO. Noone understands all implications of their own models.
-
I think we're disagreeing and agreeing.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.