A dominant narrative of the replication crisis has become "nobody knew and the rules changed" 1/
-
Show this thread
-
We should not rush to accept that. Is it true? And true of everyone's history and experiences - in every lab/dept, subfield, etc.? 2/
2 replies 2 retweets 18 likesShow this thread -
Even if it is true to some people's experiences, are we writing others out of the narrative? 3/
3 replies 2 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
And: stories are made and told to serve a purpose. We should be asking ourselves what people and what aims this narrative serves 4/
1 reply 1 retweet 16 likesShow this thread -
Sanjay Srivastava Retweeted Chris Hopwood
And even if it reflects experiences of lots of us around, is that because of its universality or survivor bias? 5/5https://twitter.com/HopwoodChris/status/921042134278356992 …
Sanjay Srivastava added,
3 replies 3 retweets 26 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @hardsci
The motto of the oldest scientific society that still exists is "take no one's word." Criticism isn't a new rule, invented by blogs.
3 replies 13 retweets 56 likes -
Yep. This is partially why I feel more nuanced takes on the "crisis" are needed otherwise we risk corrupting the (his)story.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.