"fellow academics have savaged not just Cuddy’s work but also her [...] intelligence, sometimes with evident malice" https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/18/magazine/when-the-revolution-came-for-amy-cuddy.html …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @o_guest
If this is in reference to Gelman's blog I'd have to disagree, but as usual they don't provide specifics.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @OmnesResNetwork
I can't tell the article is not clearly written.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
I guess we'll have to wait for Cuddy's book, maybe she'll provide details there...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @OmnesResNetwork
Actually the para that starts "His site became a home for frequently hostile comments from his followers." has details and I'm sure you can
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @OmnesResNetwork
verify/falsify those if you have some time using Google?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
does an anonymous comment on a blog count as a comment by a fellow academic?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @OmnesResNetwork
I think this article has quite a few bizarro claims IMHO. I have tweeted about most of what I think, as I am sure you have noticed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
obviously I don't support bullying, but I'm accused of bullying Wansink, so I'm skeptical when the bullying card gets played.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I'm sceptical of what the journalist thinks science actually is and isn't. Some bits are well-calibrated others are kinda wacky.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.