I've had this happen on NSF grant reviews a few times - "you propose this, but you do not have the experience/etc to do it." <- ignores CV
-
-
-
I suspect there is a basic "looking for reason not to fund" thing that goes on, which can then be exacerbated by implicit/explicit bias
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

