Oh look - an intro to sociology student who doesn't come to class or do the readings wrote an essay on Diversityhttps://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/10/11/defining-moment-mean-say-diversity/ …
-
Show this thread
-
Also, if sex is a visible difference at your workplace, you must work at a nudist colony. (Also, you'll still be wrong sometimes)
3 replies 4 retweets 24 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @mchris4duke @pennyb
Not all gender/sex is diagnosable from genitals tho.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Ph, that's what you meant when you said "you'll still be wrong sometimes", I guess.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I think it's actually more "correct" to diagnose people's gender based on their clothes (something they chose) than their genitals though.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Notwithstanding gender is a complex construct and only by asking and creating a space safe enough for the reply to be informed and truthful
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
will you really know. Just be aware non-binary people exist.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
And aware that a trans woman's genitals are female regardless of what they look like to you.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Same goes for non-binary people. No part of the body of a person with G gender has another gender. Their hands and genitals etc are G too.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Absolutely. My "and you still might be wrong" was clearly inadequate for conveying gorgeous diversity of humanity. I can do better
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I was merely clarifying because the gender sex dichotomy is an old fashioned and offensive way of talking about these issues. Nobody likes
-
-
their body parts to be labelled with a different gender. Body parts are either no gender or the same gender as their owner.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.