Oh look - an intro to sociology student who doesn't come to class or do the readings wrote an essay on Diversityhttps://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/10/11/defining-moment-mean-say-diversity/ …
-
-
That is what I was trying to say, may have missed
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I think it's actually more "correct" to diagnose people's gender based on their clothes (something they chose) than their genitals though.
-
Notwithstanding gender is a complex construct and only by asking and creating a space safe enough for the reply to be informed and truthful
-
will you really know. Just be aware non-binary people exist.
-
And aware that a trans woman's genitals are female regardless of what they look like to you.
-
Same goes for non-binary people. No part of the body of a person with G gender has another gender. Their hands and genitals etc are G too.
-
Absolutely. My "and you still might be wrong" was clearly inadequate for conveying gorgeous diversity of humanity. I can do better
-
I was merely clarifying because the gender sex dichotomy is an old fashioned and offensive way of talking about these issues. Nobody likes
-
their body parts to be labelled with a different gender. Body parts are either no gender or the same gender as their owner.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.