@o_guest cc'ing you because I thought of you when writing this :D
-
Show this thread
-
Good thread and question!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @synapticlee and
My opinion is that it's a good idea when/if the project is well-written up and the student and advisor are confident in the work.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @synapticlee and
Undergrads are still learning and sometimes learning means getting stuff wrong and making mistakes. Nobody wants their first attempt at
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @synapticlee and
science to be a preprint that's too immature, etc. Bad first experiences can be very upsetting.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
true! I can see that if someone puts their stuff out there and makes mistakes and a lot of criticism for it, could be a massive turn-off
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @synapticlee @o_guest and
so it's only a good idea if the supervisor takes responsibility for vetting the work (which is a lot to ask, but would be great mentorship)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
To be honest, I'm not sure if it's a lot to ask. Their name will be on it! If both parties want to go this route it seems it's the advisor's
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @synapticlee and
responsibility to ensure they have trained their student well and the work is quality.
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @synapticlee and
e.g. you could let the msc students do registered replications of previous experiments which could then be published.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Yeah, people have proposed that before. @chrismbrand for example https://thewinnower.com/papers/4827-student-research-as-a-tool-for-investigating-replicability …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.