For me, the only issue is whether the data is appropriately cited. If they've done that, they're ok in my book.
-
-
Yeah, I was thinking it was weird they didn't tell them about it but then I don't tell everyone about to cite their work either
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @PsychScientists @chrisdc77 and
I take your point about citation. My concern was really being able to get the work in a journal if the main results were in somewhere else
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Ben_C_J @PsychScientists and
One of the researchers just emailed me to say they hadnt intended to publish their analyses until we had.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Ben_C_J @PsychScientists and
Well, there you go. Let's have a thread about how we should contact researchers, before we take our argument to Twitter ;)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lakens @PsychScientists and
I totally take your point ;) Weird to turn up at a conference to find the speaker before me presenting analyses of data I've never presented
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This experience also does show that your work is making an impact though. Worst is when we collect data & no one cares.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @TonyLFreitas @Ben_C_J and
Doesn't necessarily show the impact is positive/beneficial to the authors though [in this case: yes ofc].
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @TonyLFreitas and
If Wansink release some data you can bet your butt quite a few people will analyse it & re-analyse it. Doesn't mean they respect his work.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I said in this case it's of course flattering tho above. 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
