So did they cite you properly? The preprint gives you the priority, if that's the concern
But technically they did nothing wrong with respect to the ethics of #openscience. But I imagine if you wrote an etiquette manual this would
-
-
I totally get that. I'm a little uncomfortable with the idea that 'technically doing nothing wrong' is the same as ok tho.
-
You know this idea of data etiquette for open science is exactly why I and others have been saying open data and science generally needs
-
more ethical guidelines and yes, etiquette too. So I'm glad you are on our side. People using open data for specific fascist propaganda, for
-
example, is one issue I think needs to be addressed as it keeps coming up. This one is obviously less Political and more political, but
-
nonetheless deserving of a better look at how open data and science are used.
-
There's other issue not just fascists using open data/science. For example,
@DaniRabaiotti makes a good point about poachers using data to -
locate and kill vulnerable/endangered species.
-
The problem is that nobody wants to touch this topic seriously and esp on Twitter because ethics & etiquette are lightning rod issues.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
be on this the list. But etiquette isn't the same as 100% required, of course.
-
3 "But"s in a row. *hides*
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.