It will make us very reluctant to open data before formal publication in the future, then.
-
-
Replying to @LisaDeBruine @lakens
Only if you see this kind of cited usage as a threat rather than a compliment.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chrisdc77 @LisaDeBruine
To add: I do get the emotional response. I have/had it. But rationally, this is how open science is supposed to work.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @lakens @LisaDeBruine
I put data etc in the public domain b/c I want them to reuse it freely. My emotional response to them doing what I want is positive.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Can see both emotional responses. Waiting with uploading until publication is still open science. Directly uploading is
#OpenerScience1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
The negative response is imo a ghost of Christmas past. I guess it's natural during this transitional period but it shouldn't be accepted.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chrisdc77 @JoostDessing and
Not sure it's "Xmas past" given that primacy — who found X 1st — is HIGHLY prized in sci. The paper that is published 1st gets most cites.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @JoostDessing and
If sci's are concerned about scooping then I would suggest they don't archive open data w/ their preprints. Either share at preprint stage >
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @chrisdc77 @o_guest and
> on request (or under gated model), with usage conditions attached, and/or delay open data until publication of the paper in a journal.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @chrisdc77 @o_guest and
What is untenable imo is researchers releasing open data & then expecting ppl to *necessarily* do anything beyond citing it following reuse.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes
Agreed on both. Yep. 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.