The reader might be @eric_robinson_ who is credited at the bottom of this post: http://steamtraen.blogspot.com/2017/02/a-different-set-of-problems-in-article.html …
Regardless, it seems off they don't acknowledge the "reader" or at least explain they prefer to be anonymous. As is, it looks like spin. 
-
-
yeah...in his original blog post addenda it took awhile to acknowledge our preprint. People called him out in the comments.
-
Hello. I am a reader and I did contact the authors on that date.
-
Did you wish to be anonymous?
-
I assume no, given you replied here. Did you wish to be acknowledged by name?
-
if there is some kind of cash reward like in police films then I do want to be, if there isn't then I don't really care
-
I assumed he didn't mind if I mentioned him because he has repeatedly publicly criticized Wansink:https://peerj.com/preprints/3137/
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.