Report back! Curious!
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @DrGBuckingham and
Top 5% sounds like a nice idea. This thread reminded me of some prof who required all course students to submit their work to a conference
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @DrVeronikaCH @o_guest and
Essentially outsourcing the reviewing to other staff/postdocs around the world
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DrVeronikaCH @vcheplygina and
That seems a little off. Cheeky. All the students is a lot of work.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @vcheplygina and
If you can't do your own marking certainly don't unload it onto ECRs who you'll never thank anyway.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @vcheplygina and
Also most (?) conf reviewing in my experience is done by mid- to late- career academics. So not sure it's done by ECRs, but I'm sure it is
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @vcheplygina and
field/conference dependant. A lot of people [CC
@maria_ndrnh] have the impression peer review and conf reviewing is done by postdocs. Not1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @vcheplygina and
sure why but PIs I know do more reviewing in a few months than I have ever done in my whole career so far.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @DrGBuckingham and
regardless of whether it's postdocs or PIs, it's not their job to review student papers not actually meant for the conference
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DrVeronikaCH @o_guest and
I think some conferences now instituted a maximum number of papers an author (the prof) can be on, perhaps it was due to things like this
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Maybe, Yeeesh. Thanks for telling me about this.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.