A 600-word long paper by Wansink gets a "Retract and Replace". Explaining all the errors required almost 800 words. http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2654849 …pic.twitter.com/B7TlDp2Tw8
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
You can be invested in something and yet still make a mistake. It seems they want to fix this — or has the journal been pushed you think?
well, I contacted the journal, so I assume the journal forced them to make these changes
maybe @RetractionWatch will shed some light in their story today
So the journal was not pushed and does indeed willingly want to improve this article. That's something.
umm, I told the journal I would be blogging about how journals responded. Not sure that counts as forced though.
Regardless, it seems off they don't acknowledge the "reader" or at least explain they prefer to be anonymous. As is, it looks like spin. 
yeah...in his original blog post addenda it took awhile to acknowledge our preprint. People called him out in the comments.
Hello. I am a reader and I did contact the authors on that date.
Did you wish to be anonymous?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.