A 600-word long paper by Wansink gets a "Retract and Replace". Explaining all the errors required almost 800 words. http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2654849 …pic.twitter.com/B7TlDp2Tw8
• goth gremlin • computational cognitive/neuroscience modeling • geek & techish Cypriot • plant aficionada • came up with #bropenscience • http://neuroplausible.com •
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more
Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more
By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.
| Country | Code | For customers of |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 40404 | (any) |
| Canada | 21212 | (any) |
| United Kingdom | 86444 | Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2 |
| Brazil | 40404 | Nextel, TIM |
| Haiti | 40404 | Digicel, Voila |
| Ireland | 51210 | Vodafone, O2 |
| India | 53000 | Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance |
| Indonesia | 89887 | AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata |
| Italy | 4880804 | Wind |
| 3424486444 | Vodafone | |
| » See SMS short codes for other countries | ||
This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.
Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.
When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.
The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.
Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.
Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.
Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.
See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.
Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.
A 600-word long paper by Wansink gets a "Retract and Replace". Explaining all the errors required almost 800 words. http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2654849 …pic.twitter.com/B7TlDp2Tw8
That's good; I'm sure the replacement went through peer review...right?
Also: "errors were recently discovered [...] following a letter we received from a reader on February 12, 2017." No credit to the reader?!
I highly doubt the authors would have done anything unless I contacted the editor.
The reader might be @eric_robinson_ who is credited at the bottom of this post: http://steamtraen.blogspot.com/2017/02/a-different-set-of-problems-in-article.html …
It feels weird to me that they don't acknowledge in name explicitly the "reader" — seems disingenuous, anti-the -ethos-of-science, closed.
It's possible the reader wants to remain anonymous. I guess they should ask the reader if they want a hat tip.
honestly, I think they just mentioned the reader to make it sound as if they weren't forced to do this retract and replace
Yes, this is why I used the word "disingenuous".
Also adding "reader, who wishes to remain anonymous" is not going to fudge up their word count. 
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.