Agreed with the above — I was envisaging like less than 5% of student projects would have the support and quality to be preprints.
-
-
regardless of whether it's postdocs or PIs, it's not their job to review student papers not actually meant for the conference
-
I don't know, but I was aware that the postdocs in our lab sometimes peer-review.
-
I started as a PhD student, not rare for my field though definitely not all PhD students do it
-
me too. i recently peer-reviewed conference proceedings in predictive coding.
-
I don't think I did any during my Ph.D. & this seems typical sadly. You two must have better supervision and luck than I and many others had
-
Most people I know do nothing like this during phd, it's sad.
-
because it's assumed that phd students can't provide high quality reviews. i'd object if the stud has no papers (or drafts) in subject area
-
Exactly...
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
