i just worry that with that much extra stuff it'd be impossible to differentiate signal from noise (pretty tough already)
Also most (?) conf reviewing in my experience is done by mid- to late- career academics. So not sure it's done by ECRs, but I'm sure it is
-
-
field/conference dependant. A lot of people [CC
@maria_ndrnh] have the impression peer review and conf reviewing is done by postdocs. Not -
sure why but PIs I know do more reviewing in a few months than I have ever done in my whole career so far.
-
regardless of whether it's postdocs or PIs, it's not their job to review student papers not actually meant for the conference
-
I don't know, but I was aware that the postdocs in our lab sometimes peer-review.
-
I started as a PhD student, not rare for my field though definitely not all PhD students do it
-
me too. i recently peer-reviewed conference proceedings in predictive coding.
-
I don't think I did any during my Ph.D. & this seems typical sadly. You two must have better supervision and luck than I and many others had
-
Most people I know do nothing like this during phd, it's sad.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
