A 600-word long paper by Wansink gets a "Retract and Replace". Explaining all the errors required almost 800 words. http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2654849 …pic.twitter.com/B7TlDp2Tw8
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I am not under the impression that Wansink is very invested in the ethos of scientific practice.
The journal might be.
They didn't even spot the inconsistency between the table and the text...
I think these numbers are actually okay, there is some overlap between the columns.
although I do agree this seems like a typo:https://twitter.com/sTeamTraen/status/911183178047606785 …
FYI: You probably might need to tag James for him to see it (notifications are strange beasts, this will only show on in the "All").
hmm, I was just joking, I guess it doesn't matter. @jamesheathers you see this?
It's possible the reader wants to remain anonymous. I guess they should ask the reader if they want a hat tip.
honestly, I think they just mentioned the reader to make it sound as if they weren't forced to do this retract and replace
Yes, this is why I used the word "disingenuous".
Also adding "reader, who wishes to remain anonymous" is not going to fudge up their word count. 
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.