To be honest, I'm not sure if it's a lot to ask. Their name will be on it! If both parties want to go this route it seems it's the advisor's
-
-
Top 5% sounds like a nice idea. This thread reminded me of some prof who required all course students to submit their work to a conference
-
Essentially outsourcing the reviewing to other staff/postdocs around the world
-
That seems a little off. Cheeky. All the students is a lot of work.

-
If you can't do your own marking certainly don't unload it onto ECRs who you'll never thank anyway.
-
Also most (?) conf reviewing in my experience is done by mid- to late- career academics. So not sure it's done by ECRs, but I'm sure it is
-
field/conference dependant. A lot of people [CC
@maria_ndrnh] have the impression peer review and conf reviewing is done by postdocs. Not -
sure why but PIs I know do more reviewing in a few months than I have ever done in my whole career so far.
-
regardless of whether it's postdocs or PIs, it's not their job to review student papers not actually meant for the conference
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.