science to be a preprint that's too immature, etc. Bad first experiences can be very upsetting.
-
-
Yes, me too. I was thinking it's at the discretion of supervisor + UG director - everyone would learn it but only some would make it through
-
I like this as an automatic 'reward' for the top 5 highest marked dissertations of the year. Might see if there's a thirst for it in dept
-
Report back! Curious!
-
Top 5% sounds like a nice idea. This thread reminded me of some prof who required all course students to submit their work to a conference
-
Essentially outsourcing the reviewing to other staff/postdocs around the world
-
That seems a little off. Cheeky. All the students is a lot of work.

-
If you can't do your own marking certainly don't unload it onto ECRs who you'll never thank anyway.
-
Also most (?) conf reviewing in my experience is done by mid- to late- career academics. So not sure it's done by ECRs, but I'm sure it is
- 11 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I'd say that happens already with publishing to peer-reviewed journals anyway - certainly wouldn't hurt to include this extra stage
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.