Ah, fair. I thought maybe some overarching theoretical account might explain it.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @LindaSkitka and
Trust in scientists is dif from trust in a particular outcome of a particular study. Eg former likely also driven by stereotypes of sci
2 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @mjbsp @LindaSkitka and
Makes sense. I thought the questions in Larry's work were like "how much do you trust scientists' views on GMOs?" so it's a diff betw self
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
reported trust and when the trust is actually tested. Both useful actually to understand. Esp since self reported is equally important when
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
in a representative as opposed to direct democracy, I suppose.
12:27 PM - 17 Sep 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.