Trust in scientists is dif from trust in a particular outcome of a particular study. Eg former likely also driven by stereotypes of sci
Ah, fair. I thought maybe some overarching theoretical account might explain it.
-
-
-
Makes sense. I thought the questions in Larry's work were like "how much do you trust scientists' views on GMOs?" so it's a diff betw self
-
reported trust and when the trust is actually tested. Both useful actually to understand. Esp since self reported is equally important when
-
in a representative as opposed to direct democracy, I suppose.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.