Yes, actually.
-
-
so I would exclude them . I think they would be biased
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Unless the field is very small (and so they are almost certain to get it to review anyway), my advice with editors's hat on would be >
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chrisdc77 @maria_ndrnh and
> to leave them unmentioned. For some editors (not me), flagging a reviewer as excluded will guarantee that you get them as a reviewer.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Even with a good reason?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yes that would be my advice, IF the field is sufficiently large that the odds of them being naturally invited are low.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @chrisdc77 @maria_ndrnh and
If your paper is criticising their work or a program of research they contribute heavily to them being naturally invited is surely high?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @chrisdc77 and
If they are a big name and your criticise their tiny corner of the field, it's almost guaranteed that they will be invited IMHO.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @chrisdc77 and
As an editor I probably wouldn't. Might get one of their (less invested but knowledgeable) former trainees
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @DrGBuckingham @o_guest and
But I might just be a more wonderful editor than most
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
I don't doubt that TBH. 
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @DrGBuckingham and
Although INB4: perhaps it's a low bar to say "better than somebody who ignores a polite request".
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @chrisdc77 and
Every week I learn new Internet speak from you
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DrGBuckingham @chrisdc77 and
hahaha *bows* at your service
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.