I did during my PhD (small field), but we never recommended exclusion - we just asked that if the editor did invite this person that we >
-
-
> also got an extra reviewer in addition to try to balance it out. Worked well.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Have you ever had someone to threaten to ruin your career
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Yes, actually.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
so I would exclude them . I think they would be biased
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Unless the field is very small (and so they are almost certain to get it to review anyway), my advice with editors's hat on would be >
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chrisdc77 @maria_ndrnh and
> to leave them unmentioned. For some editors (not me), flagging a reviewer as excluded will guarantee that you get them as a reviewer.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Even with a good reason?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yes that would be my advice, IF the field is sufficiently large that the odds of them being naturally invited are low.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @chrisdc77 @maria_ndrnh and
But if the field is very small and this person is almost certain to be invited, then requesting an exclusion may be the better option.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Ah, I missed this reply. Yes. We agree.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.