Facial metrics from 2D images are fine if you are just wanting to look at perceptions.
I'm not sure that does cover what I'm saying. Regardless, thanks for taking the time to explain your thoughts on that — appreciated.
-
-
For example, I worry that nobody was bothered when people showed smile intensity *didn't* predict longetivity of baseball players...
-
...but a positive finding could have had widespread bad effects if insurance companies adopted that sort of analysis.
-
I would have been bothered but sure, yeah, not as much since LGBT people continue to be murdered for their status. But yes, I'd have said it
-
is shitty science. I get called out on Twitter when I say big five is shitty.

-
Oh god I think you'd hate some of my papers
-
Probably, although to be honest I actually don't seek out papers I hate.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.