Their peers don't see them as abusers often because their persona with their peers isn't abusive. The peers who do notice Prof so and so is
-
Show this thread
-
abusive don't usually work at the same university so are less able to lodge complaint or do but are ignored by the more powerful ingroup who
1 reply 2 retweets 17 likesShow this thread -
primarily want to maintain status quo, not bring shame on department (the irony), etc.
1 reply 2 retweets 16 likesShow this thread -
I wish I could report the people I know sexually harass students, but it's pointless. Their ingroup knows this, so the only info I'll be
2 replies 2 retweets 23 likesShow this thread -
conveying is "shut her up and shut her out". The ingroup obviously know — reporting only makes one a target just like in the article.
2 replies 2 retweets 21 likesShow this thread -
End of thread.
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @o_guest
I don't like this at all. Not because of your decision o/c, which I fully understand. Perhaps there can be indirect ways to get results, I h
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @twitemp1
I whisper (as in use whisper network) a lot. I warn everybody and I also explain what is and is not appropriate. But the official route is
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
not going to work really — nobody who has the power to help cares. If they do care, the department is devoid of predators already anyway.
2 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
I know. Whispering is good but it must reach certain people. I don't know if it possible here.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
I agree. It's exhausting in an of itself.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest
It must be. Perhaps, it is job for research journalists
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.