Scientists: is this true? (from https://www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/public/philosophy-simply-harder-science/amp/ …)pic.twitter.com/R2HhI154Si
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Not to say that scientists don't work with observational data, they do. But experimental data is more "standard" for science.
Anyway my point is that however is writing this seems confused as they used experimental and observational as if they are interchangeable.
I'm not going to read the blog. I'm basing this on the extract you highlighted.
Also the idea that all scientific talks contain data is largely true, but pretty much every talk I've given has been computational modelling
which is theory implemented to capture some phenomenon. No empirical data though.
I hope that helps clarify!
It does; thanks! To clarify some more: are you saying most scientific talks include data but you usually do comp modelling which is an >>
>> exception to this, or that they usually include data but sometimes (eg comp modelling) the data used in the talk isn't *new* data?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.