case which had the context of my attempting to explain labels for me with clear examples, so it was very much one of 2 meanings (not both).
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @IrisVanRooij and
Anyway, no hard feelings from me and I'll be way more cautious in future about which topics I reply to and how much.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @IrisVanRooij and
1 last thing [sorry!] labels aren't just about feelings [altho they're important], they're also about being inclusive & diverse generally.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @IrisVanRooij and
To make last night just about my feelings, IMHO is to miss the point. I got upset because they're wider repercussions not because I'm crazy.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Clear & well understood. Being able to name acknowledges existence. Without labels, diversity can be erased by majority discourse.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
I think that the best I can do is to refrain from attempting personal communication at which I’m clearly noxious
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @twitemp1 @IrisVanRooij and
and limit it to conceptual matters, selecting very carefully the topic.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @twitemp1 @IrisVanRooij and
Obviously, this is not one I'm willing to participate right now.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'm sorry you feel this way. I'm sure I must've triggered somebody in the past. It's tough I suppose I accept that saying things can hurt
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
people. [*to accept] But I don't think avoiding personal communication is a long-term solution, I respect your decision regardless though.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Also I don't think you're noxious, for what it's worth.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.