6. A subset of ppl, let's call them Q, adopted meaning racism1 & were offended because they do not feel racist1 (& they're probably right).
-
-
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @atypical_me and
7. Another subset of ppl R denied that anyone had said Q (and R) are racist1. R thought it obvious that in context 'racist2' was intended.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @atypical_me and
8. This is why R not offended by statement, yet annoyed by Q's response bcs feels like arguing in 'bad faith'. Hence ppl R stop exchange.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @atypical_me and
I think I have missed something. Sorry. Trying to keep up
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @twitemp1 @atypical_me and
140 limit, sorry. I mean: R not offended by "All R & Q are racist" because they hear 'racist2' and not 'racist1' in this statement.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @twitemp1 @IrisVanRooij and
I actually believe something a little more nuanced than that we're/I'm racist2 and/or racist1. But obviously we're going for baby steps.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Yes, many further nuances. Linguistically problematic that 'are' suggests racist_x property of ppl, while can be of social structures etc.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @o_guest and
I saw a much more detailed analysis of 6-7+ meanings of racism come by. Let me see if I can find it again.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @o_guest and
Iris van Rooij Retweeted Noah Smith 🐇
Oh, I see now that you posted tweet linking to that analysis (thanks!). Here it is for reference in this thread:https://twitter.com/noahpinion/status/904425216373227520 …
Iris van Rooij added,
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
Nice find. I like Kelechi's thread too.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.