Does it, in your view, also include idea of involving communities affected by research in the research, so as to ensure relevance but also
-
-
to prevent 'othering' and false 'neutrality'. I think for instance of research involving autistic ppl and trans or otherwise gender
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
nonconforming ppl in the research pertaining to them, both as scientists but also as stakeholders.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @twitemp1
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
Sorry for replying to the middle tweet! I think it might be more of a broader ethics question.https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/904008304518672384 …
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I agree it is an ethics issue, but it seems not unrelated to inclusivity, because stakeholders seem differently treated in ways that are
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
exclusionary to groups that white cis able bodied neurotypical (wo)men may view as not 'equal' partners or as 'biased' or 'incapable'
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
because not sharing the priviliged neurotypical and gender normative views.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
-
I mean imagine if somebody who studied developmental neuroscience used the r-word. Would you take them seriously? Or would you fire them?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @IrisVanRooij
Scientific/social correctness changes over time, so it is challenging to have a continuity of concepts and labels. So be more flexible.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I think if you're an expert you stay up-to-date naturally.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @IrisVanRooij
Playing devil's advocate but again we need to distinguish bw being deliberately offensive and just ill informed
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.