I agree it is an ethics issue, but it seems not unrelated to inclusivity, because stakeholders seem differently treated in ways that are
-
-
exclusionary to groups that white cis able bodied neurotypical (wo)men may view as not 'equal' partners or as 'biased' or 'incapable'
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
because not sharing the priviliged neurotypical and gender normative views.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
-
I mean imagine if somebody who studied developmental neuroscience used the r-word. Would you take them seriously? Or would you fire them?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Or if somebody who studied gender called women "bitches"...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
It's the same but for even more marginalised groups than women. Engagement with the communities you research is vital. I think it's totally
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
ethical but I am not sure which ethical sub-category it would fall into. Inclusivity and diversity are important and relevant but they
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
usually refer to within science issues not the interaction of science/scientists with the community. So I'm not 100% sure. Notwithstanding,
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
women are also scientists as well as the participants in experiments, mutatis mutandis for every other group pretty much (exceptions exist
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
like for example children, who usually do not work as scientists, at least not for money).
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.