are active nots. I mean actively stopping bullying, actively disruption exclusionary cliques, actively including people who do not feel as
-
-
Scientific/social correctness changes over time, so it is challenging to have a continuity of concepts and labels. So be more flexible.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Or if somebody who studied gender called women "bitches"...
-
It's the same but for even more marginalised groups than women. Engagement with the communities you research is vital. I think it's totally
-
ethical but I am not sure which ethical sub-category it would fall into. Inclusivity and diversity are important and relevant but they
-
usually refer to within science issues not the interaction of science/scientists with the community. So I'm not 100% sure. Notwithstanding,
-
women are also scientists as well as the participants in experiments, mutatis mutandis for every other group pretty much (exceptions exist
-
like for example children, who usually do not work as scientists, at least not for money).
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.