I would like to say that I believe inclusivity is different to but obviously very relevant to diversity. Inclusivity is things like not
-
-
forming cliques, not bullying, not excluding others for a reason other than them being exclusionary themselves, and on. And all these nots
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
are active nots. I mean actively stopping bullying, actively disruption exclusionary cliques, actively including people who do not feel as
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
welcome as white cis hetero males do in science, etc.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Does it, in your view, also include idea of involving communities affected by research in the research, so as to ensure relevance but also
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
to prevent 'othering' and false 'neutrality'. I think for instance of research involving autistic ppl and trans or otherwise gender
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @o_guest
Involving communities... how? At what level?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @twitemp1 @IrisVanRooij
Well, if you research trans women but are so clueless you call them MSMs, or refer to them as "transexuals". One way to avoid that is to
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
actively engage with this community and listen to them.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Also since you research them you want to be respectful and actually have good relations with the community you use to get your participants.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Otherwise you risk your research being research only a small subset of trans women or even none as they rally against your bigoted ass. 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.