pertinent to science in an ideal world; however, this world is far from perfect and factors other than the scientific routine itself are
-
-
Replying to @twitemp1 @IrisVanRooij
known to be critical in the reviewing/recruitment process, therefore ‘inclusivity’ should be taken into account.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @twitemp1 @IrisVanRooij
In any case, this is a personal view I do not belong to any specific movement.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @twitemp1 @IrisVanRooij
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
With respect to infographics, there are good ones, e.g.:https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/889248986984591362 …
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
I would like to say that I believe inclusivity is different to but obviously very relevant to diversity. Inclusivity is things like not
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
forming cliques, not bullying, not excluding others for a reason other than them being exclusionary themselves, and on. And all these nots
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
are active nots. I mean actively stopping bullying, actively disruption exclusionary cliques, actively including people who do not feel as
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
welcome as white cis hetero males do in science, etc.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @IrisVanRooij
But all these points are just (or should be) about being civilised, not specifically related to science. 》
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Regrettably the scientific community is not as civilised as it pretends to be
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Sometimes I can't even see it pretending. Haha.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
