Of course. And as I say, even when they exist, statistical differences say nothing about individuals.
Also what does men even mean? The western gender role? Something else? Vague.
-
-
-
Dangerous then to assume there might be differences then.
-
I don't think it's dangerous. I think it's fine if it turns out there are - as long as, as you say, they aren't used as a proscription.
-
We disagree on this, I think these diff are found presupposing cis/heteronornativity which is ultimately dangerous both as di & prescription
-
Fair enough. I happened to see this quote the other day which I thought was fairly well put, though.pic.twitter.com/uiZpOWOPws
-
Many trans women are biologically different to many cis women. So? That's within gender and we're talking big potential biological diffs.
-
It doesn't make sense to even look for biological differences between genders and then relate then to jobs.
-
Otherwise, sure look as much as you want. But don't delude yourself that between gender is more varied than within.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.