This Wired article on gender imbalance in evaluations https://www.wired.com/story/why-men-dont-believe-the-data-on-gender-bias-in-science/amp … (ht @o_guest) is fascinating - a major takeaway for me...
-
-
Replying to @ctitusbrown @o_guest
...is that if you are interested in doing good science at your uni, you should STRONGLY bias towards hiring women junior faculty because...
1 reply 3 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @ctitusbrown @o_guest
...women junior faculty are both excellent and undervalued - so a kind of arbitrage. Am I missing something here?
3 replies 3 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ctitusbrown @o_guest
It's not just women that get shafted- minorities and the poor do as well. The point about scientific brilliance not being as innate is key.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
There's a culture of academic exceptionalism that mirrors privilege in non-academic society at large.
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
Academics overweigh merit and undervalue chance and systemic positive bias as contributors to success, just like the super rich.
3 replies 7 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @jaipelai @ctitusbrown
I'm assuming you mean ethnic minorities? Yeah. That's why I like the term URMs — it encompases ethnic, class, & sexuality/gender minorities.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
URM has specific meaning in US that makes me a bit wary tho (internationals do not qualify)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
What's a better term?
-
-
haven't found anything better yet, but try to qualify now ;)
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.