Glad to hear, excellent!
-
-
-
Replying to @mbeisen
About avoiding bias in the new system? I'm not a peer review expert. Research the effects of different systems on bias and then then think.
1 reply 2 retweets 5 likes -
It seems to me, that any new system should seek to be an environment in which biases based on people's names, so gender and race, are less
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes -
pronounced. The only way I see that happening is to use evidence-based evaluation of different systems.
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
Because the open in open science is also about promoting diversity. Opening science up to more authors who are just as capable but have been
1 reply 3 retweets 10 likes -
less able to (easily) publish than people with privileged gender and ethnic group.
1 reply 2 retweets 9 likes -
This work shouldn't be expected of URMs though, this is something all of us need to work on.
2 replies 3 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
Completely agree. The thing I worry about most is that openness becomes a means to openly discriminate.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @mbeisen
For some it is and they relish it even though they decry those who point it out.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
This is why I bang on about the meaning of openness and the fact it's a movement.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.