So to model it you have to realise that a person might have exactly the same end result as another, e.g., "male", but different features.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @kmpetersson and
And vice versa, the same features but end up with different genders e.g., "gender fluid" or "woman", etc.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @kmpetersson and
You would be able to locate trends above such rare cases, but would somebody be able to avoid prescriptivism, at least I hope.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @o_guest @kmpetersson and
By the way, the main reason other than cyclic logic that you can't have "woman" as a primitive is because of the perhaps obvious fact that
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @kmpetersson and
women themselves are all different to one another and how they embody the "woman" concept. Same for all other genders too.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @kmpetersson and
Thx for this point! Sadly not as obvious as it shld. E.g. 1 woman on a committee of, say, 5 men, men tend to think 'women' are represented.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @o_guest and
No idea why one would then need more that 1 man to represent all men ;)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @kmpetersson and
They do all look the same to me.


1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @IrisVanRooij and
Oh, and let's not forget the idea of a male brain and a female brain, and associating the male brain with being autistic & therefore better
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
at maths etc. These m/f models really are something rhetorically dangerous as well as scientifically problematic and cyclic.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @kmpetersson and
As well as stereotyping autistic ppl and gendering autism.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.