Feeling continental today. The argument woild be that the "naturalisation" of the category in science is whay does the discursive violence
-
-
Makes sense, low exposure to diversity. Psychology of human categorisation can explain, I think, why cis' concepts of gender may tend to be
-
different (bold conjecture: lower average Kolmogorov complexity) than from trans people, or those otherwise outside the binary/gender norms.
-
Yeah, many trans women, although I am not speaking for them, tend to open especially cis men's eyes to the possibility that straight and gay
-
make no sense if one was defining then using binarism.
-
Especially since many trans women themselves go through stages wherein their sexual orientation was read as straight, then gay, then bi
-
because the way most people describe orientation is based on their reading (often wrong) of the genders involved.
-
This is descriptors such a gyne and androphilic were created, although obv these words too suffer from inherent binarism if taken to be
-
exclusive. *This is why
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
