Could I be misunderstood? I mean neither prescriptive, nor reductive, nor even static (may change over time and with culture etc.).
-
-
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @o_guest and
Also ackn diff dimensions of gender? Behavior, personality, relationships, etc - one might identify as fem/masc to diff extent in each realm
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kleinherenbrink @IrisVanRooij and
That's binarism though. Some might place themselves on 1d between m/f others might not use that reference at all.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @kleinherenbrink and
I might describe my style of clothes as goth femme somebody else who wore the same might not use any m/f related terms.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @kleinherenbrink and
Is it description or identification, i.e. 1st or 3rd person? Thinking about myself e.g. made me realize identity may be co-shaped by others'
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @o_guest and
categorisations, which can misalign with self-identification, but that fact can become part of identity. Does this make sense?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @o_guest and
The discursive point is that you can't construct the 1st person outside of the concepts/language of the 3rd person
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JCSkewesDK @o_guest and
Indeed. Guess that's what I was experiencing when I was trying to answer the questions
@o_guest &@kleinherenbrink were raising for myself.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @JCSkewesDK and
It's very complex, especially when the term "gendered" itself has connotations of m/f and not of neutral for most people.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @IrisVanRooij and
Yes and this is the drive behind queer theory - to build a non-binary ontology
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
I'm well aware. 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.