That you may in fact opt in to it while also entertaining the notion that others might not.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @JCSkewesDK and
Could I be misunderstood? I mean neither prescriptive, nor reductive, nor even static (may change over time and with culture etc.).
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @o_guest and
Also ackn diff dimensions of gender? Behavior, personality, relationships, etc - one might identify as fem/masc to diff extent in each realm
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kleinherenbrink @IrisVanRooij and
That's binarism though. Some might place themselves on 1d between m/f others might not use that reference at all.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @kleinherenbrink and
I might describe my style of clothes as goth femme somebody else who wore the same might not use any m/f related terms.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @IrisVanRooij and
That's what I also meant to get at - which aspects of myself I consider relevant to my gender (and vice versa) may be different for others
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kleinherenbrink @IrisVanRooij and
Sure, but clothes might be part of their gender but still not on the f/m spectrum.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @kleinherenbrink and
Not describing something as on m/f spectrum doesn't imply it's not gendered.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @kleinherenbrink and
I'm personally more into being described as agender but still would describe my clothes as femme.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @kleinherenbrink and
And, yes, it's consider my clothes and part of my gender.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
*I, not it's 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.