How 'neurosexism' is holding back gender equality – and science itself http://theconversation.com/how-neurosexism-is-holding-back-gender-equality-and-science-itself-67597?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=twitterbutton … via @ConversationUK
I second Joshua's suggestion. It's not that one can't opt in if they so wish to 1d m/f spectrum but that no spectrum should be prescribed.
-
-
This is what I see as the most radical and freeing concept about discarding binarism.
-
That you may in fact opt in to it while also entertaining the notion that others might not.
-
Could I be misunderstood? I mean neither prescriptive, nor reductive, nor even static (may change over time and with culture etc.).
-
Also ackn diff dimensions of gender? Behavior, personality, relationships, etc - one might identify as fem/masc to diff extent in each realm
-
That's binarism though. Some might place themselves on 1d between m/f others might not use that reference at all.
-
I might describe my style of clothes as goth femme somebody else who wore the same might not use any m/f related terms.
-
That's what I also meant to get at - which aspects of myself I consider relevant to my gender (and vice versa) may be different for others
-
Sure, but clothes might be part of their gender but still not on the f/m spectrum.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.