You sure that's the best?
-
-
Replying to @JPdeRuiter @newscientist
It's pretty good, yes. Her new one too
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
What's pragmatic implication of yr 1st tweet JP? That observed differences plausibly biological and/or socialization effects negligible, or?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Socialization clearly not negligible, but downplaying biology is silly. For an amusing documentary about this, see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVaTc15plVs …
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @JPdeRuiter @IrisVanRooij and
From the purely scientific angle, see this excellent paper by
@StuartJRitchie et (a lot of) al.http://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/04/14/123729 …2 replies 2 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @JPdeRuiter @IrisVanRooij and
1) Didn't
@StuartJRitchie acknowledge psych. meaning is unclear? 2) Can't structural diffs just as well result from cultural exp? cf Fine4 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @JCSkewesDK @JPdeRuiter and
From 2), one could re-arrange the headline above to be more radical: "Culture may be behind biological differences between the sexes"
2 replies 2 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @JCSkewesDK @IrisVanRooij and
Hahaha. But only for the brain, right? I guess (and hope) you don't want to suggest that we talk children into growing penises or breasts.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.


