1. Nature vs nurture dichotomy is flawed conceptually and scientifically, yet both camps hold on to it. This hinders scientific progress.
-
-
I find the use of language/imagery that enforce the idea of hyper-masc vs hyper-fem a little bit jarring and hyper-simplistic (to use the
-
same prefix). Nonbinary people exist because they are exactly OFF the line between male and female.
-
Also saying that gender and sex are different is kind of old school in my opinion. I'd never dare tell a trans woman that her sex is male.
-
A trans woman's penis is no more male than a trans woman's hair is male. Body parts being assigned "sex" or "gender" in my opinion misses
-
the whole point of trying to escape a binary.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
New conversation -
-
-
Good point. Noticed same when 1st watched that clip. Not sure if choice is for presentation or theoretical commitment, but in either case
-
agreed this seems non-optimal/problematic. Perhaps
@Fausto_Sterling can shed light abt commitments vs communicative (popular science) aims. -
other work is on http://annefaustosterling.com including a little video I made recently. thanks for the discussion
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.