Fine, but in all this we've become derailed. What is your empirical argument against JP's statement? Is there one or is it ethical?
-
-
Replying to @seanrife @IrisVanRooij and
I interpret his statement (in contxt) to mean there is no evidence that essentialism is not true. But then who has the burden of proof?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JCSkewesDK @seanrife and
Again, ethically AND scientifically
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @JCSkewesDK @IrisVanRooij and
I'm a scientist. Not an ethicist.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @seanrife @IrisVanRooij and
As a scientist I don't believe evidence of structural brain differences between genders is at all relevant to claims of psych essentialism
2 replies 3 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @JCSkewesDK @seanrife and
We don't know anywhere enough about functional localization or specific plasticity processes involved
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @JCSkewesDK @seanrife and
....so I worry that there is too much opportunity to fill knowledge gaps with intuition
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
Replying to @andrea_e_martin @JCSkewesDK and
or even explicit bias in some cases!
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @andrea_e_martin and
In other discussions I've had, been surprised how many functional localisation skeptics lose their skepticism where gender is concerned
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I'm never surprised when people are sexist.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @andrea_e_martin and
True. I meant rhetorically surprised.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.