That was never the point of contention.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @JCSkewesDK and
The question was whether or not culture is definitely the cause of many sex diffs.
@JPdeRuiter pointed out this is not settled. Agree?4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Well, my question to JP was different: what was his communicative intent?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @seanrife and
Yeah, that's what I got. You were crystal clear.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @IrisVanRooij and
Seems strange to question intent rather than the claim itself.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Is it not important to understand each other well? (Especially when trying to have intelligible discussion on twitter).
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @seanrife and
No such thing as statement itself, and JP (linguist and communication researcher) knows. This is/was my common ground with him.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @o_guest and
Fine, but in all this we've become derailed. What is your empirical argument against JP's statement? Is there one or is it ethical?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Still not entirely sure what claim is. Thought materials he sent may give insight, but couldn't read all yet. Now following discussion.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @seanrife and
Iris van Rooij Retweeted J.P. de Ruiter
To be fair, I should add (remind) that JP answered me as follows:https://twitter.com/jpderuiter/status/898511585387446272 …
Iris van Rooij added,
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Fair point. 
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.