Well, my question to JP was different: what was his communicative intent?
-
-
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @seanrife and
Yeah, that's what I got. You were crystal clear.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @IrisVanRooij and
Seems strange to question intent rather than the claim itself.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Is it not important to understand each other well? (Especially when trying to have intelligible discussion on twitter).
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @seanrife and
No such thing as statement itself, and JP (linguist and communication researcher) knows. This is/was my common ground with him.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @o_guest and
Fine, but in all this we've become derailed. What is your empirical argument against JP's statement? Is there one or is it ethical?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @seanrife @IrisVanRooij and
I interpret his statement (in contxt) to mean there is no evidence that essentialism is not true. But then who has the burden of proof?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JCSkewesDK @seanrife and
Again, ethically AND scientifically
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @JCSkewesDK @seanrife and
Arguing that differences between people have biological basis ends with implying different cultures must have biological basis.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @JCSkewesDK and
But saying that differences like eg customs are biologically based is a pretty useless explanation.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
At the end of the day insisting on a biological basis for social level phenomenona is often utterly untenable as a position.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.