The fix is simple: institutions need to provide better oversight and processes. It is easily done, I've personally got them through. 2/2
-
-
Better training. Yep.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
A huge part. Nobody could be primary advisor until they had passes as secondary. Also, every student had a yearly *independent* check-up
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Thing I learned. 95% of issues are incompatibilities between advisor and student. Institutions need to identity, de-escalate, and solve them
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Some cases needed conciliation/mediation, some change in team/topic. Goal is to find a way forward everyone can accept, ideally embrace
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Improving advising is good, but doesn't address how nowadays
#tenure *reduces* academic vitality. Bc few decent jobs, ppl play it safe.2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
It's more the process typically used to decide tenure. High stakes assessment and stupid metrics. We know that doesn't work ... 1/2
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
... (Campbell's Law) and it's the same thing that breaks school education. 2/2
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
The more academia pushes out non-aggressive principled people the more it attracts and retains the opposite kind of person.
2 replies 2 retweets 7 likes -
Totally. Value integrity high, get those people into leadership. Maybe this conversation can help that. Set the culture/values to aim for.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Let's hope those with power are reading and/or those who agree with this idea obtain power.
-
-
Current
#tenure system defaults to profs who view own tenure as highest good. What systemic change could lift up profs w better values?1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.