Have to admit I find the preceding thread and "be careful" argument re: political correctness bizarre, in this context. 1/8https://twitter.com/chrisdc77/status/897490706591305728 …
-
-
Replying to @JohnSakaluk
Many folks involved/following this thread frustrated by those trying to tiptoe through the tone tulips, talking about meth. reform. 2/7
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @JohnSakaluk
But bring up status quo of racial/gender (and racial + gender) disparities, and how to challenge *that*, and the tune changes. 3/7
1 reply 1 retweet 10 likes -
Replying to @JohnSakaluk
We demand change--fast--when it alligns w our priorities. "No time for feelings!" w/ replication vs. "Wait a sec…" for SJ says smthg. 4/7
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @JohnSakaluk
What you prioritize to rage against (vs. not) communicates your values (e.g., who/what you rush to protect). 5/7
1 reply 1 retweet 14 likes -
Replying to @JohnSakaluk
Want to be careful w SJ but not replicabiilty discusisons? Say Q's of equality waste of time, but cry foul re: your exclusion? 6/7
1 reply 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @JohnSakaluk
Fine-fill your boots. But let's call a spade a spade: these priorities benefit our White Dude comfort (incl. mine), first and foremost. 7/7
1 reply 1 retweet 18 likes -
Replying to @JohnSakaluk
Thank you for phrasing it more clearly than I could
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
-
Yes thank you! Maybe it's easier heard from you than any women, POC, etc. who have been trying so hard to be heard.
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes
Sad but true.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
