But it would be great if everyone in this thread would take this approach with Etienne instead of dismissing his views.
-
-
Replying to @lakens @kathleenwade and
I don't dismiss his views, I dismiss rethorical hyperbole. I do think eg psych could use a broader political background in its sci's
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
I just don't think 'authoritarian' makes any sense at all, and I reject 'sjw's' as a pejorative
2 replies 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @rogierK @kathleenwade and
That's your right. No one is saying those views don't make sense.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Personally, I have my doubts about calling someone a 'white dude'. But again, reasonable people can differ.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
The two criticisms of SIPS that I've heard the most are: "SIPS is not politically correct enough" and "SIPS is too politically correct." Hmm
6 replies 0 retweets 26 likes -
Replying to @RolfZwaan @lakens and
The left has always been expert at this. We're just seeing a (predictable?) schism forming b/w centrist/centre-left & further-left actors.
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @chrisdc77 @RolfZwaan and
Which means: be careful or we'll end up inventing the scientific equivalent of the Labour Party with a million factions.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chrisdc77 @RolfZwaan and
I'm doing my level best not to be dismissive and to understand the viewpoint of someone i disagree with. I think that's how we got here.pic.twitter.com/NHkwXSnwL4
1 reply 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @kathleenwade @chrisdc77 and
TBF science isn't a monolith and never has been. So a million faces is literally what we are.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes
*faces/factions 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.